2016年9月10日 星期六

[轉貼文章] Bill-Engagement overpowers Opposition

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1133454616734037&id=123708701041972

Engagement overpowers Opposition

Recently I had a chance to do an assessment for an eight year old boy, diagnosed with autism and ODD.  Supposedly very oppositional, throwing fits whenever asked to do anything and demanding to have what he wants, whenever he wants it.   The poor mother was at her wits end, totally exhausted and overwhelmed.   She is used to being hit, scratched, kicked, etc if she doesn’t give him his way.  Sure enough as soon as we got there, the child was throwing fits (screaming, hitting, etc.)  over every simple snags in his expectation; demanding he play his video game, having juice, etc.  

Apparently the only activity he will do at home is playing electronic games.   Mom and I sat down at the dining room table and mom wanted him to sit at the table with us.  He refused and wanted to play his little hand held electronic game, so she let him sit down with the game.  He played his game for a few minutes while we talked.  Then he was told that in a few minutes he would need to put the game down and talk with us.  Of course he didn’t like this option and resisted.   We had been discussing with mom about using his preferred activity (electronics) as reinforcement for participating in other daily activity; what we call “first, then” (First we do ___, then you can play your game).  

Once it was time for him to put the game down, I simplied the task to “let’s color for two minutes, then you can play your game for five minutes” (he can tell time and mom is used to using the clock on her phone as a timer).   The young boy refused to give mom the game and kept resisting.  Mom kept coaxing and counseling but did not take the game.  I again clarified what the expectations were, (first we were going to color , then he can play the game for five minutes.)  He still screamed no and refused to give mom the game.  I requested mom to take the game from him, and as expected, when she did he hit her and screamed some more, demanding to get the game back.  Staying calm, I just said again, “when you are ready, we can color for two minutes then you can play the game for five minutes…let me know when you are ready.”   He screamed for about 10-20 seconds, then realized I was not going to feed into it (I said nothing; waiting patiently) and he calmed right down and was ready to color.  

 When collaborating over what to draw and color, he decided he wanted to color one of his action figures in his favorite games.  The other therapist drew the figure as the boy colored it in.   Once the two minutes were up I told him his two minutes were up and he could play the game now (mom wanted to say nothing and just let keep coloring…but I wanted him to make that choice and trust that we would follow our word.)  The young boy wanted to finish coloring the figure first.  He was having a good time discussing what he knew about the action figure and collaborating with the therapist what colors to use.  You could tell he felt very competent knowing all about the action figures and telling us about them.   He gleamed!

Once it was done, we gave him the game and again told him that he could play for five minutes and then we would color again for two minutes.   Mom and I went back to talking about using preferred activity to reinforce other activity, start short and simple and gradually expanding his engagement in other activity.  We also talked about how to expand his interests into other activity, like drawing the action figures that he loves so much (building activity around his preferences).  Once the five minutes was done, as expected he wanted to continue the electronic game; although he was much more cooperative giving it up since he knew ahead of time that he would get the game back again after coloring for two minutes.  

This time he wanted mom to draw a different action figure.  Mom googled it on her phone and the two together looked at which picture of the figure they wanted to draw and color.  The young boy was excited about that.  As mom copied the figure he was required to put his hand on the top of the marker as mom drew the figure.  He we impressed on how she could do that so well.   During this exchange there was good collaboration, with mom putting some boundaries on what he said and did.  He handled it well and was following her lead.  Together they were having fun engaging in a “we-do” activity together.  You could tell he felt competent and enjoyed the engagement.  After the two minutes I gave him a choice, “do you want to stop and go play your video game, or stay doing this with mom?”  He didn’t hesitate, he wanted to stay coloring with mom.  Once that figure was done, he wanted to draw and color another one.   At that moment he was enjoying this “we-do” engagement with mom more fun than playing his electronic game.  

In this one short session we were trying to show mom and the therapist (1) how to gradually shape greater engagement and cooperation by reinforcing engagement with the preferred activity, (2) how to use “’we-do” activity to teach relating skills, and (3) how to build other activity around his major preferences (video game figures).    The oppositional behavior decreased substantially and he was gleaming with confidence when talking about and coloring his action figures.  

From there we discussed with mom how to build a structured routine around using the electronic games to reinforce simple engagement in other daily activity (first this, than the game) by starting out with short and simple activities and then slowing expanding on the engagement.  By focusing on his strengths and preferences she could build cooperation and collaboration with her son, as long as she was clear and consistent with him.  He is a bright boy and picks up on the consistency without difficulty.  Clear, fair and consistent expectations followed by warm interaction during the we-do activities.    No punishment needed,  just clear expectations and boundaries around playing the electronics.  Of course, this along with not stop all the tantrums and resistance; however, it was a starting point for building cooperation and engagement which is the foundation to reducing the automatic resistant opposition they were experiencing.   Once this is established, we can expand from there.

2016年9月1日 星期四

[Anan原創文章] 轉變心態-問題是問題,人不是問題

[Anan原創文章] 轉變心態-問題是問題,人不是問題
-孩子本身不是“問題”,“自閉症”和我們如何看待“自閉症”,才是問題

與一位(甚至多於一位)被診斷或被懷疑有自閉症的孩子生活,絕對不是一件簡單容易的事。日常生活大大小小的問題接二連三,還甭說外出於社區,學校,社群,甚至親屬朋友圈子,也會遇到相當大的困難和壓力。

不過把自閉症的問題和孩子本身劃上等號,似乎幫助不大! 即是說,我們家長很可能被潛移默化,因太頭痛太辛苦,眼中就只看到孩子不妥的地方,甚至-認為孩子只有不妥的地方。

我記得幾年前有一次,一位導師主持一個小組,想各家長寫下孩子的優點和長處。結果許多人苦苦思索都難以寫出來,反而,說到頭痛之處,就能寫出一頁長長的清單。好像,孩子就是一堆問題,孩子就等於問題。

對家長來說,把“孩子等同問題”的壞處,是失去希望了。試想日復一日已要對著許多問題,還要覺得這些問題都沒出路,那家長還能保持正能量嗎?而且,當有新狀況出現,家長也很易把它歸因於老問題,又是問題了!這樣以圍著問題負向思維的壞處,比問題本身更具殺傷力! 難怪不少家長會被負面情緒折磨,越鑽越負面,甚至造成情緒困擾,沒有動力,越想越灰暗。

要打破這僵局,其中一個可以做的,是把問題和孩子分開。之前有一篇文章講擬人法的,我們也可把自閉症擬人法起來,例如,就當“自閉症”是一隻大怪獸吧!我們來訪問一下牠:

我: “大怪獸,你如何影響著孩子啊?”
大(大怪獸): “我令到他不想和人玩,只想自己一個! 我令他晚上睡不著,早上起不來! 我令他很固著什麼都跟他固定的規則! 我令他挑食,只食某些東西! 我令他情緒失控,大吵大鬧!......”

我: “那你最終的目標是什麼啊?”
大: “我要破壞他的成長! 我要令別人都排斥他,都不喜歡他! 我要令他封閉自己! 我要令他不能在社會中! 我要令他和父母的關係破裂! 我要令他成為一個失敗者!”

我: “ 看起來你真的很強大! 但是我相信你一定有弱點的! 你的弱點是什麼? 什麼時候你的影響比較少?”
大: “ 我最怕阿慢! 每當阿慢出現的時候,孩子就有機會思考和慢慢反應。這時我就影響不了他!而且父母對他也變得接納和包容。當父母思想改變 我就影響不了他們!
另外我最怕他們變得積極。當他們集中火力只處理能夠應付的難題時,並且他們很有計劃地,逐步逐步幫助孩子。我的力量就會變少!
我也害怕父母互相交流和學習,把他們應付我的心得互相傳播,讓我的計謀不能成功! 本來我希望分化他們,怎料他們卻因此變得團結起來,令我非常害怕!

我: “ 那麼父母怎樣才能做到以上的事呢?”
大: “ 我想他們首先要相信,然後要不斷嘗試不怕失敗,在看起來沒有出路的時候,也要懷抱希望,這樣我也不能常常影響他們了!”

我: “ 謝謝你回答我這麼多問題。最後一個問題是,其實你有沒有好的影響呢?”
大:“ 這個問題真的很有意思。大家都非常集中在我的壞影響上,居然有人會思考我的好影響,那我就告訴你吧!
其實,我有很多才能和天賦,只不過經常被人忽略及貶低吧! 例如我能夠做一些很重複的工作而不覺得沉悶,所以有一些孩子長大後能夠擔任一些品質管理方面的工作。
另外有時我讓孩子的計算技能相當出色。外國還有一位家長,開設了一間資訊科技公司,專門聘請受我影響的人仕作為員工呢! 據說他們都非常熱衷工作並且做得很出色。
當然我令到他們有很多困難,並且每個人都不一樣。不是每個孩子都能夠擁有許多才能,甚至有些孩子真的長大後仍需要很多照顧,但是他們總有一些能力,等待能夠懂得他們的人來發掘。而最懂他們的人通常是他們的父母和主要照顧者。 所以我說過我最怕他們積極和有希望!
我: “謝謝你接受我的訪問。你真的提供了很多有用的資訊。希望我能夠像你說的一樣啦!我也要和阿慢做朋友,並多作分享,多學習,多嘗試,不放棄。因為,我真的很想幫助我的孩子啊!再見!”

希望文中的“我”和“大怪獸”的對話能帶給讀者一些新角度和思維。每個家長面對的大怪獸也可能有所不同,不知你想像中的大怪獸會給你怎樣的答案呢?

[文中擬人法的方法取材自敘事治療的外化問題,有興趣未來有機會我再多作介紹,希望對大家有所助益。共勉之!]

[轉載務必列明出處。查詢RDI個案(香港或遠程)諮詢服務及家長小組: andrea.ng.rdi.hk@gmail.com
http://rdihk.blogspot.hk]

2016年8月15日 星期一

[文章轉貼]如果小朋友係"左撇子"

如果小朋友係"左撇子",應該點樣教?

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1059698060773212&id=789617517781269

原來噚日8月13日係國際左撇子日~最初,知道有呢個節日時,覺得好新奇,於是,就嘗試上網搵下關於呢個節日嘅資料~最後,發現呢個節日其實係由一個喺美國嘅左撇子組織所創立嘅~創立嘅原因係希望右撇子(世界人口的大多數—90%)喺呢一日多多關心左撇子(世界人口的小數—10%)嘅生活需要,當中包括重視佢哋喺日常生活、教育同埋工具設計上嘅權益~ 好神奇嘅係原來過往7任美國總統當中,就有5位都係左撇子!

而我喺工作嘅時候,就經常會遇到本來主用手係左手嘅小朋友被長輩強逼而改爲用右手來寫字嘅情況。佢哋喺冇指示嘅情況之下,通常都會傾向用番左手嚟攞嘢、揸鉸剪、拋波、接波等,甚至乎佢哋嘅左腳都會比較叻啲、有力啲,而主視眼都係左眼~咁點解有啲人嘅主用手係左手?有啲又係右手呢?原來,係同我哋嘅腦部發展有關,左撇子嘅右腦發展係比較發達(*須知人類嘅右腦係負責控制左邊身體嘅肌肉),而右撇子則相反,所以主用手嘅發展就好似性別一樣,都係與生俱來嘅~如果家長強逼小朋友用唔係先天嘅主用手嚟做嘢,可能會影響到佢哋嘅腦部發展~

當我哋強逼左撇子用右手嘅時候,其實同時會減少佢哋發展較爲發達嘅右腦嘅活動,科學研究發現,右腦主要負責藝術、創作、想像、視覺處理、空間知覺、圖像思考、情緒表達,是爲「藝術腦」,而左腦則主要負責語言處理、邏輯思考、判斷力、閱讀、科學/數學等,是爲「知性腦」(*可參閱附圖)。因此,強逼小朋友用右手,其實會阻礙咗佢哋右腦嘅發展、限制同埋浪費咗佢哋原本較強嘅潛能。佢哋亦可能因爲被強逼用非主用手而要用更加多時間去適應用右手嚟寫字、剪紙、做運動等,而所輸出嘅工作質素往往較低,例如:字體不美觀,佢哋通常亦會較容易覺得攰。

相信長輩強逼小朋友用右手嘅出發點都係好,想小朋友長大後,生活方便啲,須知世界上大多數嘅人都係用右手嘅,所以好多工具,例如:鉸剪、球拍、樂器、相機、售票機等都係根據用右手嘅習慣而生產嘅,於是,對左撇子嘅生活就產生咗好多不便~亦有家長因爲主用手係右手,而擔心唔識教左撇子小朋友而強逼佢哋用右手。

其實時代進步,坊間已經有好多專為左撇子而設計的用具,亦發展出更多的方法去教佢地寫字丶運用唔同嘅工具俾家長參考:http://mamaot.com/tips-for-teaching-lefties-to-write/。所以,就算小朋友係左撇子都唔需要強逼佢地用番右手,放手讓佢地自由發掘丶探索自己嘅天賦便可以了!*家長最好可以將小朋友嘅需要吿知老師,等佢地都可以在教學時作出配合。


2016年8月6日 星期六

2016年8月5日 星期五

[Anan 分享] 如何用擬人法幫助孩子

如何用擬人法幫助孩子

不知大家有沒看過奇先生和妙小姐 (Mr. Men and Little Miss). 這書的作者把一些抽像的概念化為人物和角色,例如勇敢先生,快樂先生,陽光小姐等等,並讓這些先生小姐還到不同的事,來突顯他們各自的特色。

其實對自閉症影響下的孩子,抽像概念是很不容易理解的,尤其是這些概念不是絕對,不是非黑即白,非常視乎情景和動態判斷的,對他們來說,是很難掌握的。

所以,用擬人法的方式來總結一些抽像概念,對某些自閉症影響下的孩子,或許是一個方法。

而擬人法的好處是比較有趣,亦似乎比較抽離一點,容易站在客觀的位置去了解一件事的各個面向。我來說一個應用的例子: 例如,囝囝對人的手有不太明所以的興趣,並且很喜歡捉著同學的手。我用了不同的方法讓他明白先要得到人同意才能和人握手或捉手等等,同時,我也和他一同創作了“捉手先生”這個人物,並一同看看捉先生多數什麼時候會偷偷出來搗蛋,會造成孩子自己和別人什麼困擾,會帶來什麼壞後果,他其實想做什麼,什麼時候捉先生曾經沒有出來搗亂,捉先生害怕什麼等等。

當我和孩子子討論捉先生時,我和他都比較心平氣和,好像在說別人的事一樣,能從多方面了解捉先生。而最令我驚喜的是,囝囝講出了有一天,捉先生沒有出來,因為囝囝忍得住,就算好想去捉都沒有去做。

我把捉先生畫了出來,又簡單用文字寫低了關於他的種種,更重要的是記錄了囝囝當天獨特的成功經驗。

後來,捉先生就再沒有在學校出現過了。當然這不一定只是擬人法的功勞,因為我同時和孩子進行親子遊戲治療法和RDI,這些對他的幫助也是非常的大。但我想說,擬人化的好處也是肯定的,而且每次我和他談論捉手事件時,也可避免好像怪責他,大家能用比較輕鬆的心情去面對。而這方法也幫我去把問題和孩子分開,即,問題是問題,孩子不是問題-意思是,不是他本人出了問題,而是捉手這件事帶來了問題,我們可以商量去回應這件事的。同時,用了一個人物,也比較易把一連串相關的事結合在一起,對孩子來說也是比較容易掌握的。

其實擬人化的做法,我是取材自敘事治療的“外化問題”的技巧,不過篇幅所限未能詳述,大家可以看看上述的分享,引發一下思考,看看有沒有可應用在孩子上的地方。

其實帶著受自閉症影響的孩子真不容易,尤其日常與人相處,當他能力未及時,確會鬧出不少事來。我們家長真的被練為刀槍不入,腦筋靈活,才會面對種種挑戰呢!但也因為種種挑戰,才想到許許多多的點子出來,我有時覺得自己也成了“腦筋急轉彎小姐”呢(笑)!大家加油! 共勉之!

2016年7月15日 星期五

[ANAN 分享] 總結一下play和RDI要學習的

近來回顧了自己的學習,終於好實在地明白並選擇"關係為本"為自己於自閉兒的介入方式。而第一步,就是"愛與接納"(love and acceptance)的態度, 然後就是"建立信任"(build trust), 接著就是建立孩子的"自我意識"(self awareness), 明白自己的想法,感受。"放慢"(slow down)就是很關鍵的心法。之後就是互動協調(co-regulation).

當中亦要用到"設立限制"(limit setting),和"簡化環境干擾"(productive support).

而當我們已進展到能和孩子互動時,就需要注意和他"連結"(connect)後才說話和互動,讓他更習慣以眼睛觀察和明白我們(social gaze, social referencing).

而再下來就可更多建立孩子的"情節記憶"(episodic memory), 並記著多用"經驗分享式溝通"(experience sharing language, declarative language), 少用問題和命令式語言。非語言式和多管道式溝通(non verbal communication, multi channel communication) 要多用。"放慢"(slow down)仍然是很重要的主題,必要嚴守,不要急。仍是關係為本。中間孩子可能因各種原因,例如焦慮(anxiety)或感統問題(sensory overload)而精神上或身體上離場(mentally or physically check out), 我們要繼續放慢,暫停(pausing),等候(waiting), 讓他自我調節 (self regulate), 這也是為了建立關係.

再下去就可更多給孩子挑戰(mental challenge), 但要採取"只先他一步"(one step ahead)的策略,做好"撘棚建架"(scaffolding)的工作,成為孩子的引導者(guide). 莫忘在中間多聚焦(spotlighting)成功經驗,鞏固孩子的學習。

過程中多用間接影響(indirect influence), 讓孩子自己動腦筋,尋答案,以更發展其"動態智能"(dynamic intelligence). 當然直接影響(direct influence)和講出思考過程(self talk)也可使用,讓潛規則變得明白和容易理解。

當設計和孩子一起活動時,就要設立框架 (framing) 和目標 (set objectives), 給孩子一個互動中真實的角色(authentic role). 活動中間加入變化(variation)以提高挑戰性和樂趣。速度(pacing)要配合孩子的步伐。

以上大概總結了由 non directive play therapy 和 rdi 的概念和技巧。大致已融匯貫通不少了! Happy!

關係為本介入法的共通點
…兒童為本
…尊重孩子選擇
…不用獎罰和威迫利誘
…自主自發
…享受一齊多於學習技能
…不迫不趕,尊重孩子個別的不同

*(括號內的英文字詞大部份來自RDI, 有機會或會逐一解釋)

2016年6月29日 星期三

[Anan 分享] 來認識一下阿急和阿慢!

來認識一下阿急和阿慢!

“阿急”-我們家長對他應該一點都不陌生! 他常常在我們最累趕最累最迫切的時候就出來了。我訪問過不同家長對他的理解,集合如下:

阿急的不良影響:
-阿急呀,他一出來我就好不煩惱,煩躁,毛躁,虛火上升,聲線變高,說話變大聲變快,整個人好蹦緊,心跳加速
--阿急一來,我看孩子就不順眼,那麼慢,不上心,不用心,那麼簡單都做不到,叫他都不做,越叫越急,火都來了
--阿急讓我失去冷靜,失去判斷力,讓我怒火蓋過一切
--阿急讓我反而什麼都做不了,小事變大,幾分鐘可完成的反而要半天,因為催越做不了
--阿急讓我忙不過來,因為漸漸地什麼都要我做,我越做越多,其他人越來越得少,我又越來越心理不平衡
--阿急的朋友是阿激,阿爆,阿累,阿苦,阿沒完沒了
--上學,趕車,趕出門,趕要完成時間表,趕限期時阿急就出來
--在公眾場所,或有不理解的人在旁,就要好急弄好孩子
--和人比較,和一般孩子比較,讓阿急霸佔了我的心思
--阿急讓我和孩子的關係變差了,他好像好抗拒,好怕,好驚,有時又好反叛

阿急有好影響嗎?
--有要求才會急
--有動力去做事情
--不放棄
--做事有規矩有計劃有程序

阿急什麼時間不見人呢?
阿慢什麼時候能出場?
--不趕的時候
--臨睡和睡覺時
--洗澡時,終於有私人空間,丁不被打擾
--發白日夢時,幻想和孩子去這去哪玩得好開心時
--放得低時
--放學做完功課時
--沒要求時
--想著孩子的進步時
--能退一步想時,降低自己要求時
--能多明白自閉症,多明白孩子時
--能相信孩子想變好,會成長時
--明白孩子不是不想做,是暫時做不到時

有沒有一些做法和語句能提醒自己阿慢要出來呢?
--停一停,想一想
--深呼吸
--不是死人塌樓,沒什麼大不了的
--正在改變中了
--我想變
--數10下
--喝杯水,歇一歇
--明白理解自己的感受和狀況
--說話慢一點

RDI心法中的慢下來是回應自閉症壞影響的一大利器。希望各家長繼續多了解這兩位人仕--阿急和阿慢,多回想阿慢出來後的成功經驗,多互相分享,並且不要氣餒,用阿急的優點: 盡力做不放棄! 希望在轉角的,大家加油啊!

(註: 這裡的阿慢不是指每事都慢三拍遲到遲交那些,是指RDI心法中把溝通和互動的節奏,並生活的步伐,放慢下來的意思)

(歡迎家長來享阿慢的成功經驗啊!)

[轉載務必列明出處。查詢RDI個案(香港或遠程)諮詢服務及家長小組: andrea.ng.rdi.hk@gmail.com
http://rdihk.blogspot.hk]